1. On Love and Hate
I want to
start with a simple question. Can we ever know how someone else experiences the
world? I would suggest that we can know a person for a lifetime yet we can’t
know what the felt experience is of someone else. We can listen as they
describe it, we can be empathetic, we can imagine other people’s experiences where
we live or across the world from us, we can read novels which get inside
characters, but in some fundamental way we can’t know another person’s inner
world. (Of course we may not know much about our own inner world, but that’s
another story) . Our felt inner world, our deep subjectivity, is, in essence,
known by no-one.
And yet
there lives in us, I think, a deep wish to be known. As well as a deep fear.
The wish to be known is I think a wish to be appreciated, understood, accepted,
wanted. And maybe at root it’s a wish to be loved. Loved unconditionally. But,
we worry, if everything about us is
known, would we still be loveable? So the wish to be known is in tension
with the fear - the fear that there is, or might be, something in us that stops
this happening, that there exists in us aspects of the self that someone else would
not be able to accept, or be able to love, parts of our inner world, parts of
us, they would not be able to embrace unconditionally.
So: we
contain (in two senses of the word ‘contain’) the wish to be known and the fear
of being known. Although there is a wish to be known, we can spend a lifetime
developing the art of putting up barriers to being known, truly known in all
our complex and multifaceted humanity; it’s strange that the thing we think we
want so much, we also spend such a lot of time, consciously and unconsciously,
protecting ourselves from. Along with all the time we spend cultivating a
persona, a false self, that we think might be more desirable, more acceptable,
more loveable, than our real selves in all their quirky and turbulent
splendour.
So if this
is how it is, and this is who we are – and now I am moving towards a specific
Jewish relationship to this issue - what happens when we Jews come together on
Yom Kippur (the Day of Atonement) and are faced with a liturgy that contains
the following:
“What can we say before You…”, we ask, “and
what can we tell You?” Here’s the traditional picture of a God figure, so
far away, so distant, so remote, absent almost to the point of
non-existence. “And yet…”, we
continue to read, disconcertingly, opening up a
religious paradox, “And yet You know everything, hidden and revealed.
You know the mysteries of the universe and the intimate secrets of everyone
alive…” So: here we are, looking into the mirror of our wish and our fear. “You
see into the heart and mind. Nothing escapes You, nothing is hidden from your
gaze”.
Again, the
traditional picture of a God figure, but this time so close to us as to know us
through and through, know us maybe better than we know ourselves, know us as
no-one and nothing else can know us. All our idiosyncrasies and
vulnerabilities, our foibles and peccadillos, our ugliness and our generosity,
our cruelty and our kindness, our capacity for love and our capacity for hate.
It’s all known – none of it is hidden, and none of it needs to be hidden. Whether this so-called “gaze” feels threatening
or a welcome relief will say much about us and our feelings about intimacy
and being known.
We repeat
this poetic text in each service through the day – it is at the spiritual heart
of the Yom Kippur liturgy: the encouragement one day in the year, for a few
brief hours, or minutes, to be open with ourselves about who we are, to admit
our frailties and failings, to survey the landscape of our souls and make an
account of what we have done and what we have failed to do, to admit how awful
we might have been, how inhumane and callous – but also to recognise the ways
in which we have managed to remain humane and caring, this too we bring to
mind.
And Yom
Kippur suggests that all this heart searching and soul reckoning can be done
with a kind of confidence. Maybe no other person in the world can know us as we
want to be known and fear being known - and yet by rendering an honest account
of our intimate selves, our hidden selves, something in us will change. It will
be as if we are truly known. The liturgy says: today you can, finally, be truly
known – and the experience will be transformative.
Laying
ourselves open in this way – offering ourselves as best we can through deep
introspection (without being persecutory towards ourselves) – will be like
receiving a gift, a precious sense of being judged with unconditional love. We
will come through Yom Kippur and out the other side mysteriously changed – the traditional
liturgy calls it ‘cleansed’ – we will know that we are accepted, us poor humble
flawed folk, we will feel that by reckoning with our guilt, our failures and
foibles and falsehood, by looking honestly at ourselves, the verdict at the
trial we are attending will be ‘not guilty’, you are loved, more than you know,
more than you imagine. Maybe more than you strictly deserve.
This is what
Yom Kippur offers Jews who engage with it and it has a mystery at its heart
because even if you have no sense of, or belief in, the God figure of the
liturgy, a merciful and compassionate divine presence, rachum v’chanun,
even if you are a religious sceptic, if you harbour doubts, or you’re an
honest disbeliever in the literal or
metaphorical language of our tradition, even if you struggle with or can’t
subscribe to the pieties of old - that is all strangely beside the point.
Because the
point is that by engaging with the psychodrama of the day, by spending the time
reflecting on your life, you will experience some shift by the end of Neilah,
the concluding service of this 25 hour marathon. You may not feel more loving
by the end of the day – you will still have your irritabilities – but there
will be a shift in your soul’s engagement with life.
There will
be more life within you, more sense of the possibilities that life can offer,
more hope that your life has got a meaning, or that you can make meaning out of
it. And although you might not think
about this shift using the language of love, or – heaven forbid - the language
of ‘God’, what matters is that something real will happen within you: you will
glimpse what it means to be loved, valued and wanted.
You can be
loved because you have opened your heart to the truths about yourself. You can
be loved because there is an indefinable goodness encoded within you. You can
be loved because of your unique capacity for accessing the humanity within you,
even if it gets battered and bruised by life, which it does; even if it goes
into eclipse, which it does; even if your heart gets corroded by shame or guilt
or anger or hatred, which it does. At heart you are infinitely precious, and
loveable.
Why am I talking so much about love? Love and being loved? Well, a couple of reasons. The first is to do with something my grandson said a while ago – he was four and a half – that I have been carrying around in my mind and hasn’t left me. From somewhere in him he came out with this: “The only thing that will always be true and never end is love”.
And it
struck me, when I heard about this, that not only was he giving voice to his
experience of being loved, but he was voicing a deep and universal human wish.
For that’s what it is - a wish that “The only thing that will always be true
and never end is love”. But it happens to be a wish that is threaded through
all of Jewish liturgy, which over and over again talks about God’s eternal love
of the Jewish people, a love which survives the vicissitudes of history, a love
that endures from generation to generation, despite Israel’s failures and
stiff-neckedness and betrayals.
I don’t know
what any of that really means, and I don’t believe it in any literal – or even
metaphorical – sense, but it seems to me to be a very useful piece of religious
storytelling that could still have some mileage in it. Meaning-generating
stories that offer benign ways of holding us within the randomness, chaos and
vicissitudes of life are not to be discarded lightly, I guess.
Now you
might call that child’s words - that sentiment, that proto-philosophy - about
love ‘always being true and never ending’, you might call it naïve – that life
just isn’t like that. But maybe ‘naïve’ is the jaundiced judgement of an adult world
that has lost touch with the sense of undimmed wonder that children can have. Adults
whose lives become enmeshed in all the shabbiness and sickness of soul that
surrounds us become cynical, and maybe envious of a child’s uncorrupted vision.
Maybe we had that innocence once, but it was knocked out of us by the cruelties
of the world and the cruel-hearted we encountered. Maybe we secretly long to believe it is true,
not just a hope.
But I found myself wanting to speak on Yom
Kippur about love because I am very aware of the fragility of love in a time of
hate.
Hatred right
now is all around us, everywhere we look, and it is exhausting. It corrodes our
well-being, eats into our minds and hearts. It’s spiritually exhausting being
exposed to all the hatred: all that rhetoric in the Middle East about retaliation
and revenge, and the wave after wave of racism and neo-fascism and bigotry in
so many countries, in Putin and Trump, in India, sweeping through Europe, the
list goes on and on, no nation is free of it; and all the denigration we hear
of the Other, whether women or immigrants or trans; all the animosity within
religious groups, and between religious groups, so much invective, so much
intolerance, so much anger. All the polarisation, and lack of nuance, and being
unable to tolerate ambivalence – it’s exhausting, and it’s tragic. These
endless varieties and manifestations of hate.
I don’t do
social media at all because I don’t want to be exposed to even more hatred than
I already encounter in the daily news on TV or in the newspapers. But when I
hear from my clergy colleagues about being bullied online, even by people from
their own congregation, I realise just what a mess we are in. People don’t like
it sometimes when I use the word hatred, they deny it is within them: ‘oh I
just get a bit irritated’, or maybe they admit to being ‘annoyed’ or even
‘quite angry’ - but hatred, it’s a strong word, and we shirk from it.
But it needs
to be spoken about because it conveys an aspect of all our inner lives. And one
denies it at one’s peril. I won’t begin to catalogue here the long list of my
hatreds. That’s part of the secrets of my heart. But hateful feelings arise out
of disappointments, and all the gaps between what we want or need, and the
capacity of the world and the people around us to give us what we need. So if
we speak of love we need also to speak of hate because they go together within
the human psyche.
Life will
always let us down sometimes – and how then do we mange our frustration, our
aggression, our rage? Our disappointments can tip into despair, or
hopelessness, or depression. Our anger can be turned against those we love, but
whom we feel never love us enough. Or it can be turned against ourselves - our
bodies, or our minds. Or it can get projected out so we always feel under siege
and threatened rather than seeing how threatening we can be. (This is a
particular Jewish problem). Or it can be acted out so that we rage against
those who don’t think like us, or look like us, or act like us.
Yom Kippur is not only about our capacity for love. It is also about our hatred, and rage and aggression - and what we do with it, personally and collectively. It is the problem of our age - hatred and its ramifications -the defining problem of our times. To say that our very lives depend upon finding ways of thinking about our hatred is not an exaggeration. Our planet itself is loved and treasured – a source of wonder and delight; and it is hated and abused, plundered and laid waste to. Will our love or hate have the final say?
The Jewish
vision on Yom Kippur is a refined form of chutzpa: it is grandiose and,
in its way, arrogant. It says that we Jews belong to a people who have a
responsibility to think about how to live. And this thinking about how to
live is not just about ourselves as individuals and our own personal
wellbeing; and it’s not just for us as a collective, Klal Yisrael, and
the fate of our people; but it’s a global responsibility – to work out how to
be “a blessing for all humanity” (Genesis 12:3) and the fragile planet we
inhabit. Our task is to think about how to live, how to live well, how to help
others live well. It’s an impossible task - but someone has to do it.
On Yom
Kippur Jews try to embrace that task - and in embracing that task they will of
necessity encounter the core human dilemma, the psychological and
spiritual and existential question I
have tried to sketch out here: how are we to express our love, and what do we
do with our hate?
[based on
a sermon given at Finchley Reform Synagogue, London, on the evening of October
11th, 2024]
2. On ‘The Zone
Of Interest’
Although I
have written about Jonathan Glazer’s extraordinary Oscar-winning film The Zone
Of Interest back in March, I want to return to it – the season of the Day of
Atonement (Yom Kippur), a time of self-reflection and self-examination for the
Jewish people, has prompted me into a re-engagement with the profound questions
incarnated within it.
These
questions have not left me since the day I saw it because I found the film
emotionally compelling in the sense that it exerts an overwhelming pressure on
the psyche. As I was watching it I knew I was in the presence of something that
was important in ways I couldn’t immediately grasp, but felt - in my guts, my
soul, wherever we feel these things, maybe the Yiddish word kischkes
conveys it best – I felt it had significance far beyond its immediate
context.
To my mind
it is the most important film, maybe the most important single piece of
artistic creativity, of the 21st century.
Why? Because
it speaks directly to the human condition, our situation in the world now, it
speaks to how our attention to the things that are going on around us – in our
community, our society, our world – can be so uncomfortable, so unbearable that
we find ways of not seeing and not hearing what is actually happening. It is a
film of universal relevance about denial, the psychology and dynamics of
denial, and how we protect ourselves from the consequences of our actions, and
the consequences of our inactions.
Even if you
haven’t seen the film, you may have heard about it or read about it, and so you
might have heard it described as a ‘Holocaust’ film. Well, it isn’t untrue to
describe it as a ‘Holocaust film’ - in
the sense that it is set during the period of the death camps in Europe and it
is constructed round the family home and garden of Rudolph Hӧss and his wife Hedwig who lived literally next door
to Auschwitz.
Hӧss was the
commandant of the camp, and the wall of the back garden of his family home was
the wall of the death camp. So this is a film about the Holocaust, about evil and
about how we insulate ourselves, or try to, from the knowledge of evil taking
place on our doorsteps. Part of the extraordinary way the film is made is that
you never see into the camp, there are none of the conventional images of
prisoners, or ovens, or piles of bodies, the film is tracking the everyday life
of the family who lives next to the camp, who go on picnics, tend the flowers
and vegetables in the garden, observe the butterflies. In parts it has an almost documentary feel, or the
atmosphere of so-called ‘reality’ TV, fixed cameras watching ordinary things
happen.
So the focus
is on everyday life: the cooking, the cleaning, the children playing, swimming,
visitors arriving. It is a beautiful, pastoral setting, almost idyllic (if it
wasn’t for the broader setting). But the camp is never absent, it’s just over
the wall, a space we never enter, except with our ears.
One of the
film’s five Oscars was for best soundtrack – and the soundtrack is indeed
remarkable: it’s almost another film, for the ears and the imagination, running
in parallel to what is seen on screen. There is a dull, grinding, rumbling that
you hear throughout the film, ominous and persistent – I thought for a while I
was hearing traffic outside the cinema, or maybe the sound coming from another
screen in the multiplex I was in – but no, it was the soundtrack to the film, uncanny,
unheimlich, the background reverberation droning away like a huge
industrial machine always in earshot but never visible in a scene.
What is
going on beyond the wall is literally ‘obscene’ - from the Greek, ob-skeen
(offstage/out of sight). And from time to time you can hear shots ringing out
and shouts and human cries and screams - but this is all behind the wall, ob-skeen.
And this creates a radical discontinuity
between what you are seeing and what you are hearing - and thus forced to
imagine.
So of course
this is a Holocaust film – about how ordinary people, who come home to read
their children a bedtime story, who tend their gardens lovingly and teach their
children the names of the flowers and plants, ordinary people like you and me,
who have goodness grafted to their hearts – can also have evil coiled into
their souls.
But it is
not only a Holocaust film, a film about the past: as the director Jonathan
Glazer has asserted, it’s a film about the present, about now. And that now can
be any ‘now’. The film was conceived and made long before last October 7th
but it is not possible to see the film and not think, for example, about its
disturbing relevance to how some people have, and continue to, shut themselves
away from knowing about the suffering of the people of Gaza or Lebanon. Jews
too can be locked into their Zone of Interest.
As an aside,
but an important aside – I am aware too
of the suffering of Israelis, the fears, the losses, the ongoing mourning, as
well as the pain many are having to endure from having to shut themselves off
from fully facing what is being done in their name by a government whom so many
hundreds of thousands don’t support, can’t support, haven’t supported for
years; in a different way they are trapped, bombarded psychologically by
propaganda and actions they just have to endure, feeling helpless – although
there have been many protests - trying not to let that helplessness tip into
hopelessness, trying to recover from what one Israeli woman I listened to in
the summer, a religious Orthodox woman committed to the end of the Occupation,
committed to social action with Palestinians, committed to peaceful
co-existence on a shared homeland, what this remarkable soul said – I was
running a group with a Christian pastor at a Jewish-Christian conference in
Germany (yes, the irony) – what she said she was finding it hardest to recover
from was her experience after October 7th 2023 that for the first
time in her life “they made me feel hate for them”. She had never felt that
before. Souls are being wounded in so many ways.
But to
return to the film: it is a film that challenges our complacency, the comfort
zones we inhabit, any feelings of moral superiority we might harbour: none of
us knows how we would act if our lives depended on perpetrating horrors, or
pretending horrors weren’t happening a hair’s breath away. The film asks us to
reflect on the ways in which in one way or another we all live walled off from
terrible things that we hear about and see, things we know about and don’t want
to know about. Because if we did face them it would be too unbearable.
“Too long a
sacrifice/ can make a stone of the heart/ Oh when may it suffice?” – W.B. Yeats
(Easter, 1916).
Boat people
drowning in the Channel. Millions of children in the UK in poverty, fighting
hunger, cold, deprivation. Countless homeless folk within an hour of where I
live in London (rough sleeping increased 20% in London in the last twelve
months). We don’t have to look overseas to see the same dynamic at work much
closer our homes – we all function with what the psychologists call cognitive
dissonance: inconsistencies and gaps in our thinking, contradictions between
what we believe and how we act. Jewish liturgy expresses the wish that “the
words of our mouths and the meditations of our hearts” align; but we might also
pray that the wishes for others’ well being might align with the actions we
take on their behalf.
I’ve now
started to use The Zone of Interest as a reference point in my own thinking. It
has become almost a shorthand for how our imaginations fail to be in sync with
our actions. When we know something is happening but turn a blind eye. It can
be bullying in the workplace, sexual harassment, abuse in the home – so many
situations where we construct a mental wall so that we don’t have to think
about what is happening right now, under our noses. I am sure you can all think
of situations where you have done this, or do this. Where you just don’t want
to know. Can’t bear to know.
The Jewish
community at this season, days which culminate on Yom Kippur – the day when
atonement/’at-one-ment’ is wished for - admit our shame about this, our
failures, our weakness, our inability to live up to our ideals; we admit that
our better selves do go into eclipse, our idealism fades. We acknowledge the
painful truth that we only just have enough energy to get by, to survive each
day. Because life is tough and who has the energy to get involved, to call out
injustice, wrongdoing wherever we see it? We all have zones of Interest and
zones of disinterest. I know that I do and it fills me with a kind of sadness
and a sickness of spirit, as I recognise my inadequacies, my compromises, my
weakness, my inability to let my actions truly express the empathy I have for
those who struggle and suffer in so many ways.
Like the
Biblical stories of old, The Zone of Interest has moral and psychological
complexity woven into every strand of the narrative - it is a piece of art that
provokes us into reflections about our lives, our values, our blind-spots, our
capacity for goodness and our capacity for evil. Each scene is worthy of
attention. Each scene asks questions. Each scene demands a commentary – such a
Jewish film!
A last
thought, a footnote. And the thought is this: we are obviously living through
one of the most fraught, jagged periods in the long arc of Jewish history. The
Zone of Interest’s subject matter of persecutors and victims, bystanders and
witnesses is all around us. The language that has emerged in relation to, and
in the wake of, the Shoah - of ethnic cleansing, genocide, annihilatory intent,
abuse of humanitarian law and human rights - this language fills the airways,
newspaper columns, social media. It too penetrates the mind and heart. Who can
hide from its gaze?
Questions of
who will live and who will die (and how) – universal questions affecting Jew
and non-Jew alike – press in on us each day. The questions are painful: are we
victims or persecutors, bystanders or witnesses? Perhaps we can be more than
one of those, perhaps we may occupy each of those roles at different times. It
is, necessarily, confusing.
Our souls
cower in the face of what we are living through. On Yom Kippur Jews have had –
and they may feel it is a blessing or a curse (and maybe it’s both) - but on
this day they have had the time and space to consider where the Jewish community as a whole, and each
individual, is in relation to these issues. Israel has managed to hijack Jewish
history. We tremble to think about what this next year will bring.
[based on
a sermon given at Finchley Reform Synagogue, London, on the morning of October 12th, 2024]
3. Cognitive Dissonance, the Pleasures of Life, and the Need for Stillness
I spoke earlier
today about cognitive dissonance and how we all use it to mange our lives. What
I didn’t have time to share with you is the most dramatic example of cognitive
dissonance I know.
There’s a
photo taken in Eagle Creek, Oregon in 2017 by a photographer called Kristi
McCluer – you can google it, she won a ‘photo
of the year’ award for it - a photo in
which there is a huge wall of flame dominating the whole of the horizon,
devouring a forest, the trees creating an inferno, you can almost hear the roar
of the flames, hear the cracking of the branches, feel the heat burning off the
page as you look; and in the foreground there is a golf course, it can’t be
more than 100 yards from the devastation happening in real time, and on the
course three guys are lining up their putts as if nothing is happening. Now
on the one hand this photo explains, portrays, cognitive dissonance far better
than I can do with mere words.
And it is
easy to read this photo as a powerful metaphor for indifference to a
catastrophe waiting to engulf us – not just fire or floods or hurricanes or drought
or any of the threats to the planet’s well being that are the backdrop to our
lives. It is that, and in a way it is astonishing that more people are not
crying out and screaming about the looming disaster – although some brave
souls, here in the UK, and around the word, are doing that and taking whatever
actions they can to protest this suicidal journey humanity is on.
But as we
approach the end of our Day of Atonement my thoughts turn in another direction
in relation to that scene. It’s a generous reading, interpretation, but I hope
you can bear with me as I try and open it up.
In our own
lives we all need opportunities – in spite of what is going on around us – just
to focus on ourselves: we need to find how life can offer us pleasures,
satisfactions, whether it is from companionship with others, from art, or music
or poetry or meditation, tapestry-making or marathon running, theatre,
gardening, swimming - activities we pursue on or own or with others, yes, even
playing golf, or watching sport, ways of engaging with life in all its
unfolding splendour.
On Yom
Kippur Jews reflect a lot (supposedly) on their failures, avoidances, weaknesses:
this can be painful to do, and painful
to glimpse the enormity of the work of transformation that we need to make as a
people. Of course we don’t know what this next year will bring. Some Jews are
feeling trepidation at the blowback here in the UK of the larger tragedy being
played out in the Middle East– I never mentioned antisemitism once throughout
the day and I know that is what worries some people the most. But as the day
draws to a close what I want to focus on are the possibilities that exist for
living well in spite of any fears for the future.
Life is
precious. It contains real opportunities for an intense engagement with others,
opportunities for an intensity of being, being together, sharing, laughing
together and, yes, sometimes crying together, but moments of intensity when we
know that we are really and truly alive and we wouldn’t have life any other way:
it has its losses and sadnesses but it also has a treasure house of experience
that we come across, or create. Those moments of intensity can be with others
or just private moments by oneself. I think Kafka got this right, as he got so
much right with his finely tuned intuition to what matters:
“You do
not have to leave the room, remain standing at your table and listen. Do not
even listen, simply wait. Do not even wait, be quite still and solitary. The
world will freely offer itself to you, to be unmasked, it has no choice. It
will writhe in ecstasy at your feet.”
This is the
spirituality of a so-called secularist who understood (though TB was corrupting
his lungs as he wrote) that the divine was present at every moment. “Be quite
still”, he says: what is available in the world has no choice but to offer
itself to you, here and now.
“We
declare with gratitude…” Jews say at the heart of their
central prayer “…the signs of Your presence that are with us every day. At
every moment, at evening, morning and noon, we experience your wonders and Your
goodness.” This is what Kafka is alluding to. Divine goodness is present,
present in the wonders of daily life, the ones that reveal themselves to us, and
the ones we create for ourselves. After the rigours of the penitential Day of
Atonement we will have done our work, we can return to life again. We may wish
for one another a year full of new life, a year filled with the blessings life
can bestow.
[based on
thoughts shared towards the end of the Day of Atonement as a prelude to the final
service of the day, Neilah, October 12th 2024]
No comments:
Post a Comment